Leica M-A (Typ 127)

Reduced to the essentials, lasting a lifetime or two.

10 Photos

PORTRA_400_JIPVANKUIJK_LEICA_M-A_TYP_127

Leica M-A (Typ 127) | Summicron-M 35mm ASPH. | Kodak Portra 400

Introduction

In this article I will be writing about the Leica M-A (Typ 127). Leica their newest fully mechanical rangefinder camera. The camera features no electronic parts whatsoever, no light meter or electronically controlled shutter like for example the M7 has. It is a fully mechanical rangefinder camera and it is the cheapest ‘M’ series camera Leica sells new today. The camera feels like any other M film camera Leica has ever made with the M5 as an exception. It features a cloth shutter with speeds of 1 til 1/1000th of a second and a ‘bulb’ mode that keeps the shutter open as long as you keep the shutter release button pressed just like most film M cameras have done. It has a 0.72x magnification viewfinder again like most film M cameras.

Now normally I would start writing about the camera and all the features or qualities. But with the M-A there is not much to write about. It is just a damn good, but very simple rangefinder camera. With the build quality you expect from Leica. It is probably the only Leica camera introduced in the last few years that will still work in 100 years.

So as much as I like to write about the camera, it is easier and more informative to write about the whole process of using a Leica M-A, from my personal choice of film to shooting and developing.

LEICA_M-A_TYP127_SUMMICRON_50MM_JIPVK_JIPVANKUIJK

Leica M (Typ 240) | Elmarit-M 28mm ASPH.

The camera

So what is there to write about when the camera is reduced to the essentials as much as the Leica M-A?

Well to start it is available in two different finishes. Black chrome and silver chrome. The black chrome version of the Leica M-A has no inscriptions on the top plate of the camera whereas the silver chrome version has the classic ‘Leica’ inscription on the top. The black chrome version is really stealthy and inconspicuous while the silver chrome version is a beauty to behold in itself but maybe a bit more conspicuous.

The camera is made out of a full-metal body, so there is no plastic to be found on the camera. This makes it quite heavy for such a compact camera weighing in at approximately 580 grams.

The bright-line viewfinder with automatic parallax compensation always shows you three things: a set of bright-lines, and your rangefinder focussing patch. It shows the lines in pairs of two: 28-90 / 50-75 / 35-135 to match all the viewing angles that fit inside a 0.72x magnifying viewfinder. The camera mechanically detects what lens you are mounting on the camera so it will show the correct pair of bright-lines. If I were to mount a 28mm lens it would show the 28mm lines, and in the middle the 90mm lines. If you want to go wider than a 28mm lens you will need to get an external viewfinder of the appropriate focal length that you can slide into the accessory hot-shoe on top of the camera. I found the viewfinder extremely bright and nice to the eye with good contrast in the rangefinder focussing patch. Making it easy to acquire correct and precise focus.

The camera features a horizontal rubberized-cloth focal plane shutter making it extremely quiet for a camera featuring a focal plane shutter. The shutter curtains are mechanically controlled by you selecting the appropriate shutter speed on the shutter speed dial for your photographic situation. The shutter speed dial on top of the camera has 1 stop indents, but intermediate speeds can be selected too since the mechanical timer is step less.

The camera has an easily accessible frame counter on the top right corner which automatically resets when you open the base plate. So after placing a new roll of film, you can just close the baseplate wind and shoot a blank shot and you are set for another series of exposures.

PORTRA_160_03_2015_16_LEICA_M-A_JIPVANKUIJK_JIPVK_35MM_SUMMICRON

Leica M (Typ 127) | Summicron-M 35mm ASPH. | Kodak Portra 160

Choice of film

The Leica M-A comes without a light meter so you either have to use an off camera light meter or a Leica meter that fits on the camera and is coupled to the shutter speed dial. Or just go without a meter. This is usually how I work with a meter less camera. Choosing my shutter speed based on the Sunny 16 rule of thumb.

This is why the choice of film is important. You want to use a film type that has a wide exposure latitude. Meaning it does not really matter if you are a stop over- or underexposing. For black and white photography Kodak Tri-x is the way to go, you can easily use it at ISO 100-800 on one roll and just develop it as ISO 400 and still get great results. Leica seems to think so as well and this is probably why they ship one roll of Tri-x with the camera.

I really like Tri-x and what you can do with it, but I use Kodak Portra 160 and Portra 400 most. I overexpose both films one stop and then develop at the box indicated ISO speeds. This gives less grain and nicer colours. Portra is a nice film for the M-A because it has a wide exposure latitude, it does not really matter if you get the exposure spot on. But it is better to over expose than to underexpose. So if you already start with Portra 160 rated as ISO 80-100 and Portra 400 rated as ISO 200 you are probably not underexposing and getting consistently good results. If you are coming from a digital camera this might feel strange because digitally it is better to underexpose than overexpose.

Some people like using different films a lot to try out the different film type characters and up and downsides. I think you can not really base your results on this type of trying and experimenting. You’ll only know the film and what you can do with it after using it for a prolonged amount of time. The film is less important than the developing. You can adjust the way the image looks more by developing differently than choosing another film of the same ‘type’ in my opinion. So I always advice to choose as little types of film as possible. For me the films I use most are AGFA Vista 200, because it is cheap. Kodak Tri-x 400 as my only black and white film. Kodak Portra 160, 400 and 800 for most serious work. And I used to shoot Kodak GOLD 200 a lot but I use the AGFA Vista 200 instead these days.

PORTRA_160_JIPVANKUIJK_JIPVK_LEICA_M-A_VELUWE_NETHERLANDS_LORENZ

Leica M-A (Typ 127) | Elmarit-M 28mm ASPH. | Kodak Portra 160

Developing and post processing

Black and white film I mostly develop myself at home. this is really easy as you can control the way you want your film to look exactly the way you want it to. After developing the film you can either make wet prints in a darkroom, or scan the film and then print digitally or share them online.

Colour negative film I develop at a local laboratory but I moved recently so I am looking for a new laboratory. I never try developing colour negatives myself because I am afraid I screw it up or won’t get consistent results, which I think is important.

I then scan the images with a Nikon Super Coolscan 4000 and adjust the images in Adobe Lightroom. Basically I adjust the same things as I can do while making wet prints. I wrote an article about scanning and adjusting the images which you can read here: Scanning film with Nikon Super Coolscan 4000

PORTRA_160_LEICA_M-A_TYP127_JIPVANKUIJK_JIPVK_GERMANY
PORTRA_160_LEICA_M-A_TYP127_VELUWE_JIPVANKUIJK_JIPVK

Leica M-A (Typ 127) | Summicron-M 35mm ASPH. | Kodak Portra 160
Leica M-A (Typ 127) | Elmarit-M 28mm ASPH. | Kodak Portra 160

Conclusion

For me the Leica M-A is a perfect companion to my digital M cameras. I can use all my M lenses when I want to shoot film, or when I am at a location where I know I will not be able to recharge my digital Leica camera batteries. Also if I would have to choose one camera for the rest of my life I would choose the M-A over my digital M. Simply because of the longevity of the camera.

It is a great camera, feels good in the hand and works just the way I want my film M to work. Longevity wise it is the best Leica one can buy new today. But the camera is expensive, which is probably worth it. But with a very big secondhand market for very good mechanical Leica rangefinder cameras Like the M4, M2, or even a M3 if you can live with just 50/90/135mm frame lines it is maybe hard to justify such a high price. For the price of a new M-A one can easily buy a good M2 or M4 and a few lenses.

Below you will find a few more photos taken with the Leica M-A. I hope you have enjoyed reading and checking out the images in my article and as always feel free to subscribe to my newsletter to receive an email when I write a new article, or to leave your thoughts in the comments bellow.

Donations are really welcome too since a lot of time goes into writing these articles. Donations can be made through Paypal to paypal@jipvankuijk.nl or contact me if you wish to donate in another way.

Thanks.

PORTRA_160_03_2015_06_LEICA_M-A_JIPVANKUIJK_JIPVK_35MM_SUMMICRON
PORTRA_160_03_2015_04_LEICA_M-A_JIPVANKUIJK_JIPVK_35MM_SUMMICRON
PORTRA_160_03_2015_10_LEICA_M-A_JIPVANKUIJK_JIPVK_35MM_SUMMICRON
PORTRA_160_03_2015_17_LEICA_M-A_JIPVANKUIJK_JIPVK_35MM_SUMMICRON

Leica M-A (Typ 127) | Summicron-M 35mm ASPH. | Kodak Portra 160

Special thanks to

I would like to thank Rob van Keulen and the rest at Transcontinenta for lending me the Leica M-A (Typ 127) and making this review possible.

Share this story

14 thoughts on “Leica M-A (Typ 127)

  • 3 years ago

    Mark

    it might well work in a hundred years time, but will there be any film to put in it?

  • 3 years ago

    Laszlo Gallo

    Nice camera, but too expensive (me)… ilove my m2s, simple, fast, and the brassing ohh :)

  • 3 years ago

    Don

    Beautiful and a great review – thank you! …….And in 25 or so years I hope to pass on my M6 for the next user, ‘cos it’ll still be working then and the meter can give me a feel for exposure rather than guesswork and the film (coming out of my freezer if necessary) will still forgive a bit of over or under exposure!
    As for their new products Leica can’t deliver so that’s not great service really (as per the London dealers anyway!)

  • 3 years ago

    raytoei

    Nice article and nice pictures! Basically, the m-a shares the same characteristics as the m4-p film camera introduced in the early eighties before the m6 in 1984. the only difference i can think of is that the M-A’s view finder is probably flare resistant like the modern MP unlike the M4-P.

  • 3 years ago

    Harry van Aperloo

    Mooi en interessant artikel ! Kleurenfilms ontwikkelen C41 doe ik 2x per week in een doorloopmachine,dus neem even contact op.

  • 3 years ago

    Review: Leica M-A (Typ 127)

    […] jaar op de markt verscheen. Het is geschreven in het engels, en is te lezen onder de volgende URL: http://jipvankuijk.nl/leica-m-a-typ-127/ Reacties en vragen zijn altijd welkom My Website Light is all I need. Met citaat […]

  • 3 years ago

    Pierre

    You claim that the choice of how you develop film is more important than the film. What are your choices for developing Portra?

  • 3 years ago

    Jip van Kuijk

    Hey Pierre,

    I was mostly talking about black and white film when I was talking about the film being less important than the way you develop.

  • 2 years ago

    Michael Frey

    Nice article – well done. Just one thing, the M-A manual states that intermediate values may not be used.

  • 2 years ago

    Colin Johnson

    I develop my own black and white film in a lab facility and also make prints in the dark room.

    I’m not sure I understand your comment about the way you develop. We have zero knowledge of how the film comes out until it is in the final water bath stage and then there is nothing we can do about it. Yes, we could adjust timings of agitation, the developer used and it’s concentration and how long it sits in the developing fluid, but this is more a general rule for the type of film and whether it was pushed or pulled. It would take a lot of work recording settings and the M-A doesn’t even have a meter, so I’m not following.

    With film cameras, the camera doesn’t matter, but the choice of film and lens does. All things being equal in body, lens and light, the choice of film makes the biggest difference in the final output…

  • 2 years ago

    Jip van Kuijk

    What I meant to say is that if you learn to use one typ of film, for example Kodak Portra, or Kodak TRI-X or ILFORD FP4+ all with a wide exposure latitude, you can achieve lots of different results by just using different developers and developing warmer or colder, gently or rough agitation etc. etc. In my opinion getting to know a typ of film and it’s up and downsides with all sorts of developers is worth more than just buying different types of film every time.

    I rather learn the ins and outs of one film, than use multiple sorts of film.

    Jip

  • 2 years ago

    Ruud

    Goed article, heb ervan genoten!! Groet Ruud.

  • 2 years ago

    James

    As much as a mechanical gem the M-A might be, going without a meter or relying on Sunny 16 seem retrograde steps I don’t care to take. Have an M6 and wish the next digital M can be as small or as fun to use.

  • 2 years ago

    Fahad

    Perfect write up, however every time i think about getting an M-A i cant help but remembering the MP, which comes with a meter. but again, i just love how minimal the M-A is!!

  • + Add a comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *