<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Leica Summicron-M 35mm f2 ASPH.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jipvankuijk.nl/leica-summicron-m-35mm-f2-asph/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jipvankuijk.nl/leica-summicron-m-35mm-f2-asph/</link>
	<description>Jip van Kuijk, Photography, Leica, Workshops</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 18:03:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: james		</title>
		<link>https://jipvankuijk.nl/leica-summicron-m-35mm-f2-asph/#comment-12609</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 03:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jipvankuijk.nl/?p=671#comment-12609</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I bought one about 2 years ago and I have found that on digital, the focus shift did affect images and have been stuck with ƒ/2-2.8 and ~5.6-8. I love its size and don&#039;t think it too heavy. May sell it soon before the price drops and a newer (?APO) version appears.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="ac-section-12609"><p>I bought one about 2 years ago and I have found that on digital, the focus shift did affect images and have been stuck with ƒ/2-2.8 and ~5.6-8. I love its size and don&#8217;t think it too heavy. May sell it soon before the price drops and a newer (?APO) version appears.</p>
</div><div class="ac-textarea" id="ac-textarea-12609" style="display: none;"><textarea>I bought one about 2 years ago and I have found that on digital, the focus shift did affect images and have been stuck with ƒ/2-2.8 and ~5.6-8. I love its size and don't think it too heavy. May sell it soon before the price drops and a newer (?APO) version appears.</textarea></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wilson Laidlaw		</title>
		<link>https://jipvankuijk.nl/leica-summicron-m-35mm-f2-asph/#comment-10726</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Laidlaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 06:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jipvankuijk.nl/?p=671#comment-10726</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have recently bought a 35 ASPH Summicron, as I found my chrome/brass 35 ASPH f1.4 Summilux too heavy for a travel lens, which is my main use of the 35 lens. Sadly the 35 Summicron was wrong from new and had to go straight back to Leica (I could not exchange as it was an ex-display model from Leica Montmartre). It has now come back from Leica focussing perfectly. Compared with my usual M lenses of the 35 Summilux, 50 Noctilux f.95 and on the M240 Zeiss 28-85 f3.3, unlike Jip, I find it a total featherweight :) and I much look forward to using it. Wilson]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="ac-section-10726"><p>I have recently bought a 35 ASPH Summicron, as I found my chrome/brass 35 ASPH f1.4 Summilux too heavy for a travel lens, which is my main use of the 35 lens. Sadly the 35 Summicron was wrong from new and had to go straight back to Leica (I could not exchange as it was an ex-display model from Leica Montmartre). It has now come back from Leica focussing perfectly. Compared with my usual M lenses of the 35 Summilux, 50 Noctilux f.95 and on the M240 Zeiss 28-85 f3.3, unlike Jip, I find it a total featherweight :) and I much look forward to using it. Wilson</p>
</div><div class="ac-textarea" id="ac-textarea-10726" style="display: none;"><textarea>I have recently bought a 35 ASPH Summicron, as I found my chrome/brass 35 ASPH f1.4 Summilux too heavy for a travel lens, which is my main use of the 35 lens. Sadly the 35 Summicron was wrong from new and had to go straight back to Leica (I could not exchange as it was an ex-display model from Leica Montmartre). It has now come back from Leica focussing perfectly. Compared with my usual M lenses of the 35 Summilux, 50 Noctilux f.95 and on the M240 Zeiss 28-85 f3.3, unlike Jip, I find it a total featherweight :) and I much look forward to using it. Wilson</textarea></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jip van Kuijk		</title>
		<link>https://jipvankuijk.nl/leica-summicron-m-35mm-f2-asph/#comment-10720</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jip van Kuijk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 22:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jipvankuijk.nl/?p=671#comment-10720</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://jipvankuijk.nl/leica-summicron-m-35mm-f2-asph/#comment-10719&quot;&gt;Dariel&lt;/a&gt;.

Hey Dariel,

I&#039;ve only briefly worked with any of the 35mm f/1,4 lenses by Leica, but I found them heavy. I don&#039;t really mis the one stop on the summicron. I do have the latest summilux 50mm ASPH. So if I need faster I just grab that, or up the ISO on my M (Typ 240). 

Jip]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="ac-section-10720"><p>In reply to <a href="https://jipvankuijk.nl/leica-summicron-m-35mm-f2-asph/#comment-10719">Dariel</a>.</p>
<p>Hey Dariel,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve only briefly worked with any of the 35mm f/1,4 lenses by Leica, but I found them heavy. I don&#8217;t really mis the one stop on the summicron. I do have the latest summilux 50mm ASPH. So if I need faster I just grab that, or up the ISO on my M (Typ 240). </p>
<p>Jip</p>
</div><div class="ac-textarea" id="ac-textarea-10720" style="display: none;"><textarea>In reply to <a href="https://jipvankuijk.nl/leica-summicron-m-35mm-f2-asph/#comment-10719">Dariel</a>.

Hey Dariel,

I've only briefly worked with any of the 35mm f/1,4 lenses by Leica, but I found them heavy. I don't really mis the one stop on the summicron. I do have the latest summilux 50mm ASPH. So if I need faster I just grab that, or up the ISO on my M (Typ 240). 

Jip</textarea></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dariel		</title>
		<link>https://jipvankuijk.nl/leica-summicron-m-35mm-f2-asph/#comment-10719</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dariel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 22:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jipvankuijk.nl/?p=671#comment-10719</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Do you prefer Summicron&#039;s  35mm f/2 character and feel to Summilux&#039;s 35mm f1.4?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="ac-section-10719"><p>Do you prefer Summicron&#8217;s  35mm f/2 character and feel to Summilux&#8217;s 35mm f1.4?</p>
</div><div class="ac-textarea" id="ac-textarea-10719" style="display: none;"><textarea>Do you prefer Summicron's  35mm f/2 character and feel to Summilux's 35mm f1.4?</textarea></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nathan		</title>
		<link>https://jipvankuijk.nl/leica-summicron-m-35mm-f2-asph/#comment-10180</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 12:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jipvankuijk.nl/?p=671#comment-10180</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@jim: I also _had_ the Zeiss 35/2,8 and have tested extensively the Summicron ASPH 35. The Zeiss is more pleasing in its OOF rendering, being smoother, with better colour transitions. As a bonus, it is smaller. But its filter size is weird, and it fits a good Leica ecosystem a bit less well. 

That said, phenomenal. I&#039;ve settled with an even stranger lens, the Canon 35/1,5 LTM, which focuses to 1 metre, but is 185g, and sharp enough. 

As for Jip: great photography, great blog. Great work. Keep it up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="ac-section-10180"><p>@jim: I also _had_ the Zeiss 35/2,8 and have tested extensively the Summicron ASPH 35. The Zeiss is more pleasing in its OOF rendering, being smoother, with better colour transitions. As a bonus, it is smaller. But its filter size is weird, and it fits a good Leica ecosystem a bit less well. </p>
<p>That said, phenomenal. I&#8217;ve settled with an even stranger lens, the Canon 35/1,5 LTM, which focuses to 1 metre, but is 185g, and sharp enough. </p>
<p>As for Jip: great photography, great blog. Great work. Keep it up.</p>
</div><div class="ac-textarea" id="ac-textarea-10180" style="display: none;"><textarea>@jim: I also _had_ the Zeiss 35/2,8 and have tested extensively the Summicron ASPH 35. The Zeiss is more pleasing in its OOF rendering, being smoother, with better colour transitions. As a bonus, it is smaller. But its filter size is weird, and it fits a good Leica ecosystem a bit less well. 

That said, phenomenal. I've settled with an even stranger lens, the Canon 35/1,5 LTM, which focuses to 1 metre, but is 185g, and sharp enough. 

As for Jip: great photography, great blog. Great work. Keep it up.</textarea></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim		</title>
		<link>https://jipvankuijk.nl/leica-summicron-m-35mm-f2-asph/#comment-10090</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 05:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jipvankuijk.nl/?p=671#comment-10090</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Have you had the chance to use the Zeiss 35mm/2.8 Biogon-C? I also own the 35/2 Cron ASPH, purchased as an upgrade to the 35/2 V4 cron, which I sold when I went digital. I found I really missed the lightness of  the V4. As you mentioned, the ASPH is heavy for its size. The Zeiss balances so well on the M9 it&#039;s a joy to use. It&#039;s also one of the most flare resistant lenses I&#039;ve used. 

The Zeiss has a smoother transition and nice OOF rendering (I don&#039;t want to use the B word...) where the ASPH sometime feels busy. I think your smoking man is an example of this.

Great write up and nice images!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="ac-section-10090"><p>Have you had the chance to use the Zeiss 35mm/2.8 Biogon-C? I also own the 35/2 Cron ASPH, purchased as an upgrade to the 35/2 V4 cron, which I sold when I went digital. I found I really missed the lightness of  the V4. As you mentioned, the ASPH is heavy for its size. The Zeiss balances so well on the M9 it&#8217;s a joy to use. It&#8217;s also one of the most flare resistant lenses I&#8217;ve used. </p>
<p>The Zeiss has a smoother transition and nice OOF rendering (I don&#8217;t want to use the B word&#8230;) where the ASPH sometime feels busy. I think your smoking man is an example of this.</p>
<p>Great write up and nice images!</p>
</div><div class="ac-textarea" id="ac-textarea-10090" style="display: none;"><textarea>Have you had the chance to use the Zeiss 35mm/2.8 Biogon-C? I also own the 35/2 Cron ASPH, purchased as an upgrade to the 35/2 V4 cron, which I sold when I went digital. I found I really missed the lightness of  the V4. As you mentioned, the ASPH is heavy for its size. The Zeiss balances so well on the M9 it's a joy to use. It's also one of the most flare resistant lenses I've used. 

The Zeiss has a smoother transition and nice OOF rendering (I don't want to use the B word...) where the ASPH sometime feels busy. I think your smoking man is an example of this.

Great write up and nice images!</textarea></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Review: Leica Summicron-M 1:2/35mm ASPH.		</title>
		<link>https://jipvankuijk.nl/leica-summicron-m-35mm-f2-asph/#comment-9962</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Review: Leica Summicron-M 1:2/35mm ASPH.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 10:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jipvankuijk.nl/?p=671#comment-9962</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] hoort. Ik heb geprobeerd de veelzijdigheid van het objectief te tonen.   Je kunt het hier lezen: http://jipvankuijk.nl/leica-summicron-m-35mm-f2-asph/ (in het Engels)    My Website Light is all I need.        Met citaat [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="ac-section-9962"><p>[&#8230;] hoort. Ik heb geprobeerd de veelzijdigheid van het objectief te tonen.   Je kunt het hier lezen: <a href="http://jipvankuijk.nl/leica-summicron-m-35mm-f2-asph/" rel="ugc">http://jipvankuijk.nl/leica-summicron-m-35mm-f2-asph/</a> (in het Engels)    My Website Light is all I need.        Met citaat [&#8230;]</p>
</div><div class="ac-textarea" id="ac-textarea-9962" style="display: none;"><textarea>[&#8230;] hoort. Ik heb geprobeerd de veelzijdigheid van het objectief te tonen.   Je kunt het hier lezen: http://jipvankuijk.nl/leica-summicron-m-35mm-f2-asph/ (in het Engels)    My Website Light is all I need.        Met citaat [&#8230;]</textarea></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
